To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Wed Dec 20, 2006 6:46 am (PST)
In his article posted at http://web.northnet.org/minstrel/ohio.2006.htm Richard Hayes Phillips called attention to suspicious numbers of undervotes/overvotes for the US Senate candidates reported by 17 Ohio counties.
UNOFFICIAL RESULTS IN SEVENTEEN OHIO COUNTIES CANNOT BE RIGHT
Richard Hayes Phillips, Ph.D.
December 7, 2006
ABSTRACT: In the November 7, 2006 election in Ohio there were 350,669 more
ballots cast than the number of votes counted for United States Senator.
In 16 counties there were 268,987 uncounted votes, or 19.46% of ballots cast,
compared to 82,957, or 2.99%, in 71 other counties. Cuyahoga County alone
accounted for 148,928 uncounted votes, or 26.48% of ballots cast in the county,
and 42.47% of the statewide total of uncounted ballots. In Marion County there
were 1,275 more votes counted for United States Senator than the reported number
of ballots cast, which is an impossibility. If the rate of uncounted ballots
in the 17 suspect counties had been about 3%, as was the case elsewhere in the
state, there would have been about 42,000 uncounted ballots instead of 269,000.
This indicates that 227,000 votes may have been lost by the touch screen voting
machines, which were utilized in all 17 of the suspect counties.
NOTE: This analysis is based upon unofficial results. If the official results
should reduce these discrepancies, the question will remain as to how the
unofficial results could have been so erroneous in the first place.
* * * * *
In the 2006 general election, according to the official website of Ohio
Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell, there were 4,177,498 ballots cast in
the State of Ohio. Of these, only 3,831,716, or 91.72%, contained votes for
Governor, and only 3,826,829, or 91.61%, contained votes for United States
Senate. These numbers create the appearance of undervote (or overvote) rates
of 8.28% and 8.39%, respectively, in the two most hotly contested statewide
races on the ballot. When the unofficial election results are examined
county by county, there is a strikingly abnormal distribution of undervotes
and overvotes. I have chosen the United States Senate race to examine in
detail because there were only two candidates on the ballot (and one write-in
candidate), which makes the mathematical analysis simpler than for the
Governor’s race, in which there were four candidates on the ballot (and two
write-in candidates). A similar analysis could be done, and should be done,
or the Governor’s race, and for all races in which the unofficial results
were very close.
The methodology was simple. The percentage of undervotes and overvotes for
each county was derived by fifth grade mathematics. The total number of
votes counted for the candidates combined was subtracted from the number of
ballots cast. The remainder is the number of uncounted ballots, or
undervotes plus overvotes. This number was divided by the number of ballots
cast to determine the percentage of ballots left uncounted in each county.
The complete data set for all 88 counties is appended to this paper.
There are 88 counties in Ohio. Of these 88 counties, according to unofficial
results posted by J. Kenneth Blackwell, 71 counties had rates of undervotes
and overvotes ranging from 0.88% (in Greene County) to 6.90% (in Holmes
County). In 62 of these 71 counties, the percentages were tightly clustered
between 2.00% and 4.50%. The rate in these 71 counties combined was 2.99%.
In 16 of the other 17 counties, including 4 of the 10 most populous counties
in the State of Ohio, the percentages of undervotes and overvotes were
clearly anomalous, ranging from 11.91% (in Montgomery County) to 26.48% (in
Cuyahoga County), with a combined rate of 19.46%, or six and one-half times
the rate in the rest of the state. Just four counties — Cuyahoga, Lucas,
Montgomery and Stark — accounted for 219,332 undervotes and overvotes, or
62.55% of the statewide total of 350,669. Cuyahoga County alone accounted
for 148,928 undervotes and overvotes, or 42.47% of the statewide total. It
is difficult to believe that more than one in four voters in Cuyahoga County
could not decide between Sherrod Brown and Mike DeWine.
UNOFFICIAL RESULTS: UNITED STATES SENATE
Ballots Cast Votes Counted Undervotes/Overvotes
16 counties 1,382,455 1,113,568 268,987 19.46%
71 counties 2,775,090 2,692,133 82,957 2.99%
In Marion County, Blackwell reported 19,853 total votes cast, and 21,128
votes counted for the United States Senate candidates — an overcount of
1,275 votes. These are known as “phantom votes,” because they are
apparitions, with no explainable origin. There can never be more votes
counted for an office than the number of persons voting in the election.
UNOFFICIAL RESULTS: UNDERVOTES AND OVERVOTES
County Ballots Votes Undervotes/ Voting
Cast Counted Overvotes Technology
Cuyahoga 562,498 413,570 148,928 26.48% touch screen
Morrow 15,679 12,242 3,437 21.92% touch screen
Belmont 29,045 23,192 5,853 20.15% touch screen
Coshocton 16,138 13,107 3,031 18.78% touch screen
Licking 70,705 57,704 13,001 18.39% touch screen
Jackson 12,025 9,974 2,051 17.06% touch screen
Lucas 164,003 139,003 25,000 15.24% touch screen
Tuscarawas 36,124 30,750 5,374 14.88% touch screen
Stark 139,646 119,011 20,635 14.78% touch screen
Perry 12,775 10,894 1,881 14.72% touch screen
Carroll 12,664 10,898 1,766 13.95% touch screen
Highland 14,351 12,358 1,993 13.89% touch screen
Wood 50,666 44,190 6,476 12.78% touch screen
Adams 9,592 8,378 1,214 12.66% touch screen
Hancock 28,692 25,114 3,578 12.47% touch screen
Montgomery 207,952 183,183 24,769 11.91% touch screen
Marion 19,853 21,128 -1,275 -6.42% touch screen
Note that there is no county falling between Holmes County (6.90%) and
Montgomery County (11.91%). The counties listed above are clearly anomalous.
The unofficial results cannot be right. And, of course, the unofficial
results in Marion County are impossible.
Note also that all 17 counties listed above utilized touch screen voting
machines, known in the trade as Direct Recording Electronic (DRE). 31 of 88
Ohio counties utilized optical scanners, and none of them had this problem.
Data on voting technology utilized in 2006 by each Ohio county is displayed
on a map provided by http://www.yourvotecountsohio.org
A word of caution is in order. In the 2005 general election in Ohio, several
counties reported incorrect figures for total ballots cast. The false
numbers were derived by counting absentee ballots twice, as the Diebold
tabulators were programmed to do. However, there is no evidence that this is
the cause of the abnormally high numbers of undervotes and overvotes reported
in 16 counties in the 2006 general election. The combined totals of absentee
and provisional ballots are reported by Blackwell for each county, and in no
case are these numbers anywhere near what would be required to account for
the discrepancies.
To the contrary, unofficial voter turnout in these 17 counties was 54.35%,
compared to 52.21% in the other 71 counties of Ohio. That is not much of a
difference. There were 1,402,408 ballots cast in these 17 counties. If the
rate of undervotes and undervotes had been about 3%, as was the case
elsewhere in the state, there would have been about 42,000. Instead there
were 267,712 (or 268,987 if one takes into account the 1,275 phantom votes
in Marion County).
This raises the disturbing possibility that some 227,000 votes were lost
by touch screen voting machines in Ohio. Surely this merits a full-scale
investigation. Whether or not this “affected the outcome,” a phrase
generally intended to mean who won and who lost the election, is beside
the point. If 227,000 votes were not counted, the outcome was affected.
VOTER TURNOUT, UNITED STATES SENATE
UNOFFICIAL RESULTS: NOVEMBER 7, 2006
County Registered Ballots Percent Votes Undervotes/
Voters Cast Turnout Counted Overvotes
Adams 16,966 9,592 56.54% 8,378 1,214 12.66%
Allen 68,892 35,138 51.00% 33,758 1,380 3.93%
Ashland 35,499 19,458 54.81% 18,636 822 4.22%
Ashtabula 62,265 34,415 55.27% 33,614 801 2.33%
Athens 42,573 17,525 41.16% 17,078 447 2.55%
Auglaize 32,759 16,877 51.52% 16,427 450 2.67%
Belmont 43,396 29,045 66.93% 23,192 5,853 20.15%
Brown 27,436 14,290 52.08% 13,831 459 3.21%
Butler 236,998 114,908 48.48% 110,908 4,000 3.48%
Carroll 20,169 12,664 62.79% 10,898 1,766 13.95%
Champaign 25,162 14,553 57.84% 14,168 385 2.65%
Clark 90,057 49,972 55.49% 48,934 1,038 2.08%
Clermont 127,759 65,531 51.29% 63,308 2,223 3.39%
Clinton 25,826 12,749 49.37% 12,394 355 2.78%
Columbiana 79,855 37,143 46.51% 36,104 1,039 2.80%
Coshocton 20,768 16,138 77.71% 13,107 3,031 18.78%
Crawford 28,923 17,072 59.03% 16,430 642 3.76%
Cuyahoga 1,054,670 562,498 53.33% 413,570 148,928 26.48%
Darke 34,357 20,435 59.48% 19,726 709 3.47%
Defiance 25,769 13,168 51.10% 12,981 187 1.42%
Delaware 108,733 64,927 59.71% 63,248 1,679 2.59%
Erie 51,017 30,645 60.07% 29,795 850 2.77%
Fairfield 96,566 54,246 56.18% 52,441 1,805 3.33%
Fayette 15,476 8,510 54.99% 8,340 170 2.00%
Franklin 766,490 342,958 44.74% 333,466 9,492 2.77%
Fulton 28,633 16,269 56.82% 15,728 541 3.33%
Gallia 23,320 9,976 42.78% 9,862 114 1.14%
Geauga 63,299 40,006 63.20% 38,765 1,241 3.10%
Greene 104,200 57,168 54.86% 56,663 505 0.88%
Guernsey 25,429 12,936 50.87% 12,365 571 4.42%
Hamilton 566,661 282,190 49.80% 273,129 9,061 3.21%
Hancock 49,855 28,692 57.55% 25,114 3,578 12.47%
Hardin 17,604 9,805 55.70% 9,388 417 4.25%
Harrison 10,936 6,234 57.00% 5,967 267 4.28%
Henry 19,618 11,697 59.62% 11,201 496 4.24%
Highland 25,679 14,351 55.89% 12,358 1,993 3.89%
Hocking 18,035 9,800 54.34% 9,465 335 3.42%
Holmes 18,204 8,564 47.04% 7,973 591 6.90%
Huron 35,645 18,635 52.28% 18,020 615 3.30%
Jackson 21,748 12,025 55.29% 9,974 2,051 17.06%
Jefferson 48,693 26,344 54.10% 25,364 980 3.72%
Knox 36,348 20,784 57.18% 20,180 604 2.91%
Lake 154,048 86,684 56.27% 84,134 2,550 2.94%
Lawrence 41,470 19,209 46.32% 18,731 478 2.49%
Licking 102,300 70,705 69.12% 57,704 13,001 18.39%
Logan 29,730 16,488 55.46% 15,955 533 3.23%
Lorain 190,767 98,664 51.72% 96,324 2,340 2.37%
Lucas 296,541 164,003 55.31% 139,003 25,000 15.24%
Madison 23,597 13,583 57.56% 13,106 477 3.51%
Mahoning 175,923 96,027 54.58% 92,497 3,530 3.68%
Marion 43,814 19,853 45.31% 21,128 -1,275 -6.42%
Medina 121,000 65,600 54.21% 64,384 1,216 1.85%
Meigs 15,690 7,912 50.43% 7,661 251 3.17%
Mercer 30,985 15,510 50.06% 14,966 544 3.51%
Miami 68,309 36,686 53.71% 36,089 597 1.63%
Monroe 10,054 6,266 62.32% 5,925 341 5.44%
Montgomery 375,459 207,952 55.39% 183,183 24,769 11.91%
Morgan 9,605 5,480 57.05% 5,370 110 2.01%
Morrow 23,962 15,679 65.43% 12,242 3,437 21.92%
Muskingum 51,907 29,004 55.88% 27,739 1,265 4.36%
Noble 8,650 5,453 63.04% 5,124 329 6.03%
Ottawa 28,773 17,734 61.63% 17,238 496 2.80%
Paulding 13,619 7,749 56.90% 7,409 340 4.39%
Perry 20,888 12,775 61.16% 10,894 1,881 14.72%
Pickaway 30,917 17,383 56.22% 16,860 523 3.01%
Pike 18,320 9,632 52.58% 9,508 124 1.29%
Portage 103,718 55,283 53.30% 53,557 1,726 3.12%
Preble 27,699 16,007 57.79% 15,552 455 2.84%
Putnam 24,259 14,545 59.96% 14,031 514 3.53%
Richland 90,641 46,124 50.89% 44,900 1,224 2.65%
Ross 42,351 23,008 54.33% 22,262 746 3.24%
Sandusky 40,477 23,129 57.14% 22,265 864 3.74%
Scioto 47,285 26,072 55.14% 25,466 606 2.32%
Seneca 34,982 20,399 58.31% 19,818 581 2.85%
Shelby 29,476 17,523 59.45% 16,926 597 3.46%
Stark 270,515 139,646 51.62% 119,011 20,635 14.78%
Summit 373,289 199,256 53.38% 193,188 6,068 3.05%
Trumbull 141,393 81,011 57.29% 78,552 2,459 3.04%
Tuscarawas 56,295 36,124 64.17% 30,750 5,374 14.88%
Union 30,004 17,076 56.91% 16,554 522 3.06%
Van Wert 20,347 10,642 52.30% 10,299 343 3.22%
Vinton 8,666 4,598 53.06% 4,412 186 4.05%
Warren 127,843 66,684 52.16% 64,859 1,825 2.74%
Washington 39,547 23,134 58.50% 22,369 765 3.31%
Wayne 70,067 39,130 55.85% 37,753 1,377 3.52%
Williams 25,329 13,174 52.01% 12,687 487 3.70%
Wood 93,272 50,666 54.32% 44,190 6,476 12.78%
Wyandot 15,428 8,303 53.82% 8,006 297 3.58%
TOTAL 7,851,499 4,177,498 53.21% 3,826,829 350,669 8.39%